We're excited to be releasing our third Book Club post. This month, we have selected works curated by VBI PF staff members Matthew Salah, Ellie Singer, and Chris Conrad focusing on international relations. These are fantastic works that are important for every debater to be familiar with when engaging in a complex topic area such as international relations. Feel free to leave comments or questions about the works we've selected at the Reddit thread.
Book: Nuclear Politics: The Strategic Causes of Proliferation by Alexandre Debs
Nuclear weapons can be a confusing topic, but it is important to understand both as a global reality and also as something that appears in basically any debate topic that involves international relations. “Nuclear Politics: The Strategic Causes of Proliferation” by Yale professors Alexandre Debs and Nuno Monteiro provides a rich analysis of why states acquire nuclear weapons, how they interact with other states, and how all of these patterns appear in history. While the book is pretty long, it’s extremely well written and you can certainly read it in bits and pieces if you so choose. Debs and Monteiro go case-by-case in every section, which helps readers understand not just the theories behind proliferation but also how they actually look. I love this book because instead of treating proliferation as something purely cerebral and theoretical it grounds theories very clearly in reality, which makes the book informative and accessible to audience members with any level of background interested in nuclear politics.
Pick up a copy of the book here.
Article: “Don't Come Home America: The Case Against Retrenchment,” by Stephen Brooks, G. John Ikenberry, and William Wohlforth
“Don't Come Home America: The Case Against Retrenchment,” by Stephen Brooks, G. John Ikenberry, and William Wohlforth is a fantastic article for students seeking to learn about great power politics in international relations. Brooks, Ikenberry, and Wohlforth take a realist perspective to forcefully argue in favor of US leadership of the international system (commonly known as hegemony). The article is focused on refuting arguments made by advocates of retrenchment, in which the US would pull back from its global commitments and distribute more burdens on its allies in order to reduce defense spending. I really like this article because it gives a very comprehensive introduction to the scholarly debate about the ideal US grand strategy. The article contains in-depth argumentation supporting US hegemony, and also lays out responses to common arguments made against US leadership. As a result, students will be introduced to both sides of the scholarly debate, and those seeking to read literature supporting the side of the scholarly debate will find plenty of resources in the footnotes of this article.
Find the article here.
Podcast: 'A Feminist Voyage Through International Relations' by J. Ann Tickner
 
International relations has historically been a field dominated by men. This is objectionable not only because it’s highly exclusionary, but also because it has a tangible impact on the theories the field produces. Ann Tickner pioneered the feminist perspective on IR: a doctrine that emphasizes subjectivity, contingency, and cooperation. In this podcast, Tickner outlines her feminist approach and uses it to analyze the hypermasculinity of US policy following 9/11. I recommend this piece because it’s important for students to understand that there are alternative frameworks to realism, and this podcast exemplifies the diversity of IR scholarship.
Find the podcast here.
 
                
              


 nor because it contains the most useful information. Instead, I chose make it sick because I think that the science of learning has a special claim to temporal priority. If you are going to learn three things, a) how to be ethical and a debater b) how the human mind processes information and c) how to learn in a way that will help you remember information later, its best to learn the learning first, that way you can apply those lessons to each of the other subjects in turn.It’s the beginning of the school year, you are about to spend nine months reading for classes, drilling for debate, studying for exams, and remembering for life. And the scary thing is that the majority of things you learn this year will be forgotten by the time next year roles around. Humans keep in long-term memory and shockingly small percentage of the information they try to retain.Luckily we can do better, and even minor changes in how we study and learn can pay real dividends in long-term retention. There has been a huge growth in scientific work on human memory and learning, and Make it Stick does a wonderful job of presenting that science in an accessible form and in giving practical advice on how to learn this science to improve your own learning. It also does a wonderful job of using the very principles of effective teaching in the design of the book. Thus, the book not only tells, but also shows how to learn well.Your goal while reading this book should be to both familiarize yourself with a vocabulary with which to think about your own learning and to learn some practical tips and principles you can use to change how you study and drill."
 nor because it contains the most useful information. Instead, I chose make it sick because I think that the science of learning has a special claim to temporal priority. If you are going to learn three things, a) how to be ethical and a debater b) how the human mind processes information and c) how to learn in a way that will help you remember information later, its best to learn the learning first, that way you can apply those lessons to each of the other subjects in turn.It’s the beginning of the school year, you are about to spend nine months reading for classes, drilling for debate, studying for exams, and remembering for life. And the scary thing is that the majority of things you learn this year will be forgotten by the time next year roles around. Humans keep in long-term memory and shockingly small percentage of the information they try to retain.Luckily we can do better, and even minor changes in how we study and learn can pay real dividends in long-term retention. There has been a huge growth in scientific work on human memory and learning, and Make it Stick does a wonderful job of presenting that science in an accessible form and in giving practical advice on how to learn this science to improve your own learning. It also does a wonderful job of using the very principles of effective teaching in the design of the book. Thus, the book not only tells, but also shows how to learn well.Your goal while reading this book should be to both familiarize yourself with a vocabulary with which to think about your own learning and to learn some practical tips and principles you can use to change how you study and drill." Marshall Thompson:
Marshall Thompson:
 he is also the co-founder and President of the Centre for Effective Altruism. This podcast episode is an illuminating insight into the basics of Effective Altruism, which is the idea of using science, reason, and evidence to find the best possible way to make a difference in this world. Effective Altruism is a movement that really hit me hard after contemplating my lifestyle choices and spending on luxury items that are really unnecessary. Debaters, by virtue of living in the United States, have many opportunities. These include opportunities to succeed in life, to debate, to make the most of their futures. But they also include the opportunities to use what they are fortunate enough to have by being lucky enough to be born here to greatly benefit the lives of others who are not as lucky to live here and instead live lives characterized by suffering and destitution. I think every debater should seriously consider the impact that they can have on the world right now and this podcast episode might just force you to care a little more about the world outside. MacAskill spends this podcast discussing a wide variety of issues, but the focus of the episode is on effective altruism. He also discusses cognitive biases, mistakes, and the meaning of life. This episode is a must listen to for those unfamiliar with MacAskill and his works."
 he is also the co-founder and President of the Centre for Effective Altruism. This podcast episode is an illuminating insight into the basics of Effective Altruism, which is the idea of using science, reason, and evidence to find the best possible way to make a difference in this world. Effective Altruism is a movement that really hit me hard after contemplating my lifestyle choices and spending on luxury items that are really unnecessary. Debaters, by virtue of living in the United States, have many opportunities. These include opportunities to succeed in life, to debate, to make the most of their futures. But they also include the opportunities to use what they are fortunate enough to have by being lucky enough to be born here to greatly benefit the lives of others who are not as lucky to live here and instead live lives characterized by suffering and destitution. I think every debater should seriously consider the impact that they can have on the world right now and this podcast episode might just force you to care a little more about the world outside. MacAskill spends this podcast discussing a wide variety of issues, but the focus of the episode is on effective altruism. He also discusses cognitive biases, mistakes, and the meaning of life. This episode is a must listen to for those unfamiliar with MacAskill and his works."